British Computer Society
BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT, promotes wider social and economic progress through the advancement of information technology science and practice. BCS serve over 68, members including practitioners, businesses, academics and students, in the UK and internationally. In the London Computer Group merged with an association of scientists to become the British Computer Society Ltd. s Technology took off in the 60s, not just with space exploration but also on the ground with huge advancements in computers.
April 30, The institute selected the displays to create a "digital-first environment" for its person staff, comptuer to a press release. Sign up now for the Digital Signage Today newsletter and get the top stories delivered straight to your inbox.
Forgot your password? You may sign into this site using your brjtish credentials from any of these Networld Media Group sites:.
Display Technology. Hardware The British Computer Society deploys Clevertouch touchscreen displays for offices Clear Channel deliverssquare feet of digital signage in Vegas Neuosys Technology intros rugged digital signage system. DOOH celebrates how to grow hair on your face. Trending DOOH celebrates teachers Carousel Digital Signage enhances child support services efficiency with digital signage Clear Channel deliverssquare feet of digital signage in Vegas The British Computer Society deploys Clevertouch touchscreen displays for offices 3 ways to make digital signage less what is british computer society. The material on this site may not computre reproduced, distributed, cached, or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Networld Media Group.
All rights reserved. Already a member? Sign in below.
thumb|Sir Maurice Wilkes served as first President of BCS in The British Computer Society (BCS) is a professional body and a learned society that represents those working in information technology (IT) and computer science, both in the United Kingdom and internationally. Founded in , BCS has played an important role in educating and nurturing IT professionals, computer . The British Computer Society is the leading professional body for those working in IT. It has over 65, members in more than countries and are the qualifying body for Chartered IT Professionals (CITP). They are also an international awarding body for a wide range of qualifications for both users of IT and IT specialists. Nov 13, · The British Computer Society (BCS) are a professional body that ensures that the legal, ethical and social issues within the IT industry are followed to Author: Daniel Adu.
Catch up on stories from the past week and beyond at the Slashdot story archive. The only way I can see it being important is if the computing industry ever reaches the point where there's a real benefit in being able to call yourself a "Chartered IT Professional" or somesuch much as you can be a Chartered Engineer, Chartered Accountant or Chartered Surveyor and if you are, you're legally allowed to do some things you wouldn't otherwise be able to.
Management don't want the best trained, they want the cheapest who can do the job. Maybe Safety Critical applications should be restricted to 'Chartered' status employees, that would provide a reason for the BCS to exist and provide a benefit to being a member. Until then, they are nothing more than a University Alumni type of organisation.
It will never happen. They want IT to be the next Factory job where you get low wages and bad hours And companies dont want that. This is why you dont see companies demanding certifications and education levels Because they will be forced to double pay rates. But corporations dont want you.
They want dirt cheap mediocre labor. They might not want to but they end up having to concede and hire a seasoned developer to clean up the mess I've seen this happening in 15 years work. I've not seen any evidence to the contrary. It doesn't mean that right now there is no j. You're missing the point. The exact hourly rate isn't what the parent was getting at, the issue is that many businesses have listened to the old "Good, fast cheap - pick any two" adage and made their decision.
There are a lot of low skill jobs in IT, and I have no problem in populating them with lower paid workers. Why pay higher than call centre rates for IT support staff that sit there answering the phones reading from scripts? That must be the reason every mainland country in Europe associates "Brittish soccer fans" with the worst kind of hooligans? Sure, and the French go around with stripey T-shirts and wearing necklaces made of onion, while the Germans live on a diet of beer and 15 different kinds of sausage.
Or maybe decades-old stereotypes that apply to a tiny fraction of the population aren't very helpful. It may only apply to a tiny fraction of the population, but it's more than a stereotype - during the Europe Cup in Portugal there were much ore British people arrested than other countries, and in fact one of them is still fighting in courts to avoid extradition after he managed to return to England. At first I wondered why you chose a street, rather than a station, but presumably we're using the "Queen's Admiralty" rules?
That's not a station. All are on the Central Line. That's rather shortsighted. You leave yourself wide-open to a McMurdoch attack, without an escape route, and at the wrong end of the High Barnet branch.
What benefits does it have? Basically, you can attain levels of experience that you can then use to demonstrate to potential new employers that you have experience, and skills used in industry. Unfortunately, it's all very management biased, and anti actually doing any computing biased.
For example, IIRC, the various programming skills start at level 1 qualifications max out at level 6, while management skills start at level 5 and max out at level It represents bragging rights when applying for new jobs —a CV with "I have BCS level 9 qualifications" on it helps at some companies. You mean the same way saying you're a level 70 Mage in world of warcraft is? I got the impression it's more like a social club for people looking for other techies to go for a drink with.
It's not even very good for that - I was a member for a while and the locations they chose for meetings were invariably out-of-town hotels and conference centres you'd need to drive to. If people already have a computer science degree how are some noddy certificates from a self important club going to help? Potential new employers will be a lot more impressed if you have a first or 5 years doing hard core development at a blue chip. Call me an out-of-place mathematician, but what's the difference between a scale from 5 - 10 and a scale from 1 - 6?
They both have six levels. The fact that they re-use known symbols sequential Arabic digits to name those levels is just convenience. Numbering management with a minimum qualification level of 5 is consistent with standard assumptions about managers that they don't know what a baseline is , so maybe the numbering system is really a subtle joke? Most people see "ah, I see you're a level 6 manager, you must be as experienced, and wonderful as this level 6 programmer", despite the programmer having to have 20 years experience and done crazy amount of testing, and the manager basically being a basic line manager.
The difference is that Level 1 is "newbie with no experience and easy to achieve" where as level 5 is "experienced professional requiring a reasonable amount of evidence". I had to use the levels when I did an "Industrial Experience" year and found that even moderate programming experience shot you up to about level 3 without much effort.
The problem was that I was supposed to show development, but level 4 required more specialist things that not everyone does. Under the "old way", the benefits were lots of lectures that you got to go to on various subjects, plus the chance to network with other professionals. Useful stuff really; some of those lectures were great. Under the 'new way', they've altered the way the "chartered" membership works; as it was in the old days, you could become a chartered IT professional without having to prove anything other than you'd stayed in the IT sector for 5 years.
Now there are a series of exams to pass and frequent re-evaluation to maintain it more in line with chartered engineer status from the engineering professions. Really, I think a lot of the new changes are to make the BCS more relevant to what commerce wants to know, rather than being a comp sci enclave. The thrust has changed direction, though this isn't necessarily a bad thing. It's impossible to tell, though.
If he were a Fellow of both or a Member of both then he should put the awarding membership first, but I think the rule about listing Fellowships before Memberships overrides that rule. I had to meet with a bunch of BCS reps when my course was re-accredited, and the experience matches up with what the summary says. They were obsessing over whether the mathematics of CS were too difficult and all kinds of bogus concerns.
I think their problem is that higher level courses are inherently not an "everyone's invited" thing. Because not everyone will succeed. And that's how it should be. They're difficult if they're done right, because they include a lot hard-line theory behind the soft 'Let's do Java' exterior. The BCS just can't seem to accept this though.
They want to pervert the courses to make them easier, basically. I have no idea of their motives but whatever they are, they're going about them the wrong way. I went to maybe 3 math classes in my last year, and still got my diploma with flying colours. It's not about making it easier, it's about making it useful. Perhaps some of the point is, for once in the cess-pool that is the modern, utility and mediocrity obsessed tertiary education system, to attempt to provide broad-ranging bases of abstract knowledge to the students who actually want to learn, and are capable of doing so.
That way we'll at least get some people who can work at the coal face of knowledge creation as opposed to just another batch of clueless, money-grabbing code monkeys? The sort of useful you're talking about is concerned with places where all the interesting, hard problems have already been solved. Sounds dull as dishwater if you've got a brain in your head. Editing mine Sure. And there is are degrees for that. Math degrees. Physics degrees. Teaching abstract stuff is useless unless you explain, at some point, how those theories can be applied to real world situations.
What you end up with are stupid problems where all the variables are given or easily findable in the context of the problem, and absolutely NO "education" of how to find the variables, nor anything else. What you end up with are kids or young adults who can probably work a Laplace trans. It's the misunderstanding de jour, at least in the UK, that the ideal situation is for everyone to be getting top marks in every exam they take - mostly due to bloody school league tables and the "everyone must go to uni" mentality.
The previous government's brilliant solution to this issue? Much as I enjoy kicking them now they're down, to be fair the main reason for that was the range of marks an 'A' grade covered. Student's in the UK are in an awful catch at the moment. If they do well, people complain that their exams were worthless, and that they've only achieved what they have because everything's so much easier than "back in the day".
Aside from when a friend of mine was flat out told he got the job because from a bunch of otherwise pretty much identical candidates, he was a member of the BCS, and none of the others were. I think the no confidence voters have been a bit slow to get their message out, the BCS has already sent out shiny information packs explaining why you should vote for them I abstained due to this information shortage.
I voted no about scrapping the rule of 50 members for a vote of no confidence though, seems like a nice democratic safeguard to me. Definitely the BCS has been dumbed down successively over the past 16 years I have been a full member, I suspect that this is because they basically want more members so lower the entry bar, in order to get the membership funds in their coffers. Anyway, I think a rocket up the ass like this is good for any organisation so we will see what comes out of it.
I recall that many years ago the Australian Computer Society ditched the IT mob, so that you had to be a computer scientist to get in. I was a "member" when I was a student, because it was free for me. Yes, presumably the BCS ie, our resources are being used to put out the material opposing the original motion, whereas those who called the EGM probably don't have the resources for a publicity campaign.
The key issue seems to be one of financial transparency, with suspicion of irregularities [wikispaces. The odd thing is that I agree with the sentiment, but not with the votes. If you read t. Its a society run by and for people who cut their teeth on s and 60s mainframes. Nothing wrong with that, but people seem to assume it has any relevance or authority today.
It doesn't. No one I know in IT belongs to it or is even the slightest bit interested in it. Its the computing equivalent of a historic car club with similar types of people as members. I belong to it, but only because my employer pays the membership fee.
<- What does a vampire bite feel like - How to thaw a 20 lb turkey in one day->